Demux

[Krishna Kishore-8]

 
Hi,

   I have seen that everyone uses opensource ffmpeg demux or qtdemux.
   I did not come across anyone writing their own demux using their own
parser module.

   Why does everyone use this opensource demux? Is it because it is
   already available, well tested?
   OR did anyone try it and faced problems and switched to opensource
demux?


Regards,
Kishore.
SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER
-------------------------
This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. In
case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you must not, directly or
indirectly, use, Disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message and you are
requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in this message are
those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing contained in this message
shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken Communication
Technologies Limited ("Sasken") unless sent with that express intent and with due
authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent the spread of
viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this email


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
gstreamer-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel

[Edward Hervey]

On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 20:18 +0530, Krishna Kishore wrote:

> Hi,
>
>    I have seen that everyone uses opensource ffmpeg demux or qtdemux.
>    I did not come across anyone writing their own demux using their own
> parser module.
>
>    Why does everyone use this opensource demux? Is it because it is
>    already available, well tested?
>    OR did anyone try it and faced problems and switched to opensource
> demux?

... I think the *real* reason why everybody does that is because it's
pointless/insane/masochistic to recode things that are already
available.

  If there's something you want that qtdemux doesn't implement yet, file
a bug asking for that.

   Edward

>
>
> Regards,
> Kishore.
> SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER
> -------------------------
> This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. In
> case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you must not, directly or
> indirectly, use, Disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message and you are
> requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in this message are
> those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing contained in this message
> shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken Communication
> Technologies Limited ("Sasken") unless sent with that express intent and with due
> authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent the spread of
> viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this email

  Mails where the disclaimer is bigger than the actual message normally
don't get answered.

>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
gstreamer-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel