Administrator
|
Hi All,
I have just discovered that the gst-inspect description of udpsink (on Windows OSSBuild and Linux) includes several signals that are not mentioned in the online description of udpsing (google on "gstreamer udpsink".
Is this one of those documentation oversights we all lament or is it telling me something more? Should I post it to bugzilla?
Wes
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel |
On 08/22/11 19:42, Wesley J. Miller wrote:
Where are you missing them. I can see them: http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/doc/gstreamer/head/gst-plugins-good-plugins/html/gst-plugins-good-plugins-multiudpsink.html#gst-plugins-good-plugins-multiudpsink.signals They are coming from the baseclass. Stefan gstre _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel |
Administrator
|
I looked here: http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/doc/gstreamer/head/gst-plugins-good-plugins/html/gst-plugins-good-plugins-udpsink.html
After searching for udpsink not multiudpsink.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel |
okay baby steps: 1.) you look here: http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/doc/gstreamer/head/gst-plugins-good-plugins/html/gst-plugins-good-plugins-udpsink.html 2.) while you don't see the signal you are looking for do: 2a.) go to parentclass in the [Object Hierarchy]. GstUdpSink is-a GstMultiUDPSink is-a GstbaseSink is-a GstElement is-a GstObject is-a GObject. Stefan
_______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel |
Administrator
|
Thus I know the answer to what should be my original question, why does GST-INSPECT show it while the online docs do not. GST-INSPECT knows to follow the family tree uphill.
However, this does raise the question, why wouldn't the online docs also show the same information. Surely the automated stuff that produces the online docs could either follow the tree or at least list links to the tree. I, and our fellow gentle readers,
now know — are reminded — to climb the family tree, but newvies don't know this and won't likely find this post without a bit of luck. Could the lowest level docs at least mention that other properties and signals may be availabe? Or better "…available here
->http://whatever"?
Wes
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel |
Excuse me but why are bananas yellow and strawberries not? gst-inspect has nothing to do with the api-docs. The api docs are generated html. If someone adds a signal to a base class, how should that magically appear in all the pregenerated html pages for packages containing subclasses?
Its all linked. If you have a feasible idea how to improve, please let me know. Coincidence or not, I am happen to be the gtk-doc maintainer. Stefan
_______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |