opposite of parse

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

opposite of parse

Josh Doe
Silly question: what's the opposite of parse? I'm working with a
proprietary video container that only stores uncompressed frames
(simple header, minimal footers). I've written *parse (using
GstBaseParse), but now I need to be able to write to this format. *enc
doesn't make sense, since there's no encoding, and likewise with *mux
since there's no multiplexing (only video frames stored, no audio).
Thanks,
-Josh
_______________________________________________
gstreamer-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: opposite of parse

Tim-Philipp Müller-2
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 08:32 -0400, Josh Doe wrote:

> Silly question: what's the opposite of parse? I'm working with a
> proprietary video container that only stores uncompressed frames
> (simple header, minimal footers). I've written *parse (using
> GstBaseParse), but now I need to be able to write to this format. *enc
> doesn't make sense, since there's no encoding, and likewise with *mux
> since there's no multiplexing (only video frames stored, no audio).

We tend to use 'enc' for that case as well, e.g. y4menc or wavenc.

People have also suggested 'format', but it hasn't caught on. I think
*mux or *enc is much more intuitive.

Cheers
 -Tim

_______________________________________________
gstreamer-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: opposite of parse

Josh Doe
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Tim-Philipp Müller <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 08:32 -0400, Josh Doe wrote:
>
>> Silly question: what's the opposite of parse? I'm working with a
>> proprietary video container that only stores uncompressed frames
>> (simple header, minimal footers). I've written *parse (using
>> GstBaseParse), but now I need to be able to write to this format. *enc
>> doesn't make sense, since there's no encoding, and likewise with *mux
>> since there's no multiplexing (only video frames stored, no audio).
>
> We tend to use 'enc' for that case as well, e.g. y4menc or wavenc.
>
> People have also suggested 'format', but it hasn't caught on. I think
> *mux or *enc is much more intuitive.

I'll go with that then, thanks!
-Josh
_______________________________________________
gstreamer-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel