Hi,
I have a source element that produce me 10 buffer in a hour (I'm recording with 10 frames per hour). If i have a pipeline for that, and press ctrl+c in the 12th minutes, the pipeline still freeze for 8 minutes, until the next frame arrives and the EOS message. Is there any way to avoid this 8 minutes? I have similar issue with network cameras, if I have network loss, the pipeline will stay in a kind of deadlock until the timeout signals take their actions and stop the pipeline. I can't stop the save, set elements to null, do some padblock etc until that, or is there a way to do one of these actions during the freeze? Regards, Tibor _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel |
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 14:42, Kocsis Tibor <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I have a source element that produce me 10 buffer in a hour (I'm > recording with 10 frames per hour). If i have a pipeline for that, and > press ctrl+c in the 12th minutes, the pipeline still freeze for 8 > minutes, until the next frame arrives and the EOS message. Is there > any way to avoid this 8 minutes? I have similar issue with network > cameras, if I have network loss, the pipeline will stay in a kind of > deadlock until the timeout signals take their actions and stop the > pipeline. I can't stop the save, set elements to null, do some > padblock etc until that, or is there a way to do one of these actions > during the freeze? it's a problem for us. is it true that the events and other control messages are always goes with the buffers? ie. is it possible to send them asynchronously/independently from the buffers? regards -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel |
On 02/16/2011 09:54 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 14:42, Kocsis Tibor <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a source element that produce me 10 buffer in a hour (I'm >> recording with 10 frames per hour). If i have a pipeline for that, and >> press ctrl+c in the 12th minutes, the pipeline still freeze for 8 >> minutes, until the next frame arrives and the EOS message. Is there >> any way to avoid this 8 minutes? I have similar issue with network >> cameras, if I have network loss, the pipeline will stay in a kind of >> deadlock until the timeout signals take their actions and stop the >> pipeline. I can't stop the save, set elements to null, do some >> padblock etc until that, or is there a way to do one of these actions >> during the freeze? > > it's a problem for us. > is it true that the events and other control messages are always goes > with the buffers? > ie. is it possible to send them asynchronously/independently from the buffers? > regards hi, anybody from the core team can comment this? thanks. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel |
On 02/22/2011 01:00 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 09:54 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 14:42, Kocsis Tibor<[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a source element that produce me 10 buffer in a hour (I'm >>> recording with 10 frames per hour). If i have a pipeline for that, and >>> press ctrl+c in the 12th minutes, the pipeline still freeze for 8 >>> minutes, until the next frame arrives and the EOS message. Is there >>> any way to avoid this 8 minutes? I have similar issue with network >>> cameras, if I have network loss, the pipeline will stay in a kind of >>> deadlock until the timeout signals take their actions and stop the >>> pipeline. I can't stop the save, set elements to null, do some >>> padblock etc until that, or is there a way to do one of these actions >>> during the freeze? >> it's a problem for us. >> is it true that the events and other control messages are always goes >> with the buffers? >> ie. is it possible to send them asynchronously/independently from the buffers? >> regards > hi, > anybody from the core team can comment this? > thanks. Events can go independently from buffers when the SERIALIZED flag is cleared. Wim _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |